Paper-collage of ShapeScale, outlined in teal, versus Evolt 360
Collage of real product photos

ShapeScale vs Evolt 360

In a same-day test against DEXA, ShapeScale's body fat readings landed within 0.2 points for the one founder tested against Evolt 360, versus 4.4 points for Evolt 360.

0.2pt

ShapeScale's average distance from DEXA

ShapeScale
0.2 pt
Evolt 360
4.4 pt

At a glance

ShapeScale compared with Evolt 360 at a glance
Criterion ShapeScaleEvolt 360
Avg. deviation from DEXA 4.4 pt
Visual output None; numeric dashboard with gamified badges.
Price $8,000 plus $200/mo software and result-sheet paper ($116 per 500 sheets)

What switchers say

Dr. Jake Deutsch

“What ShapeScale provides is another level.”

My previous scanner got less specific as patients got healthier. ShapeScale's body-composition analysis is far more accurate, and the images are photographic versus Styku, which looks like a gray blob. I depend on it every day to provide precision medical care.

Dr. Jake Deutsch Founder, Oakwood Precision Medicine, NYC. Switched from Styku
Trina Barr

“Visible, tangible, undeniable proof.”

ShapeScale provides a visible, tangible, absolutely undeniable metric of proof, and it quantifies into a dollar amount from the patient's investment. Styku felt underwhelming, clients said the avatar didn't look like them. ShapeScale actually looks like you.

Trina Barr Owner, Innovaes Med Aesthetics
Elon Rosenthal

“Fit3D was too big and imprecise. This isn't.”

Fit3D was too big and imprecise. ShapeScale gives us the precise measurements we need, and clients line up to use it again. We run ads with discounted scans to bring people in, and it opens them to our other services.

Elon Rosenthal Owner, Hydro Body Sculpt, Concord CA. Switched from Fit3D
Dr. Johnny Franco

“Currently the best thing on the market.”

ShapeScale is currently the best thing on the market because it doesn't just take measurements, it gives images that are relatable rather than a printout of numbers most of us aren't going to look at. It helps with retention, the people interested in this data are in it for the long term.

Dr. Johnny Franco Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon, FACS. Austin Plastic Surgeon
Dr. Peter Koltz

“A differentiator no one else in our area offers.”

This is a big tool, a differentiator that no one else in our area offers. The ability to quantify outcomes and show patients objective measurement changes, and the ability to close consults, has been better since instituting ShapeScale.

Dr. Peter Koltz Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon. Founder, pēkoMD
Randy Green

“Manual measurements are full of human error. This isn't.”

Manual measurements are less efficient, less consistent, less accurate, and more intrusive. ShapeScale is easier, more comfortable for clients, and eliminates human error. New clients get a baseline automatically, and existing clients keep seeing progress.

Randy Green Owner, Ultimate Fitness, Mill Valley

Trusted by 1,000+ locations

  • UCSF
  • PatientPoint
  • Milwaukee Bucks
  • OrthoCarolina
  • UFC Gym
  • Well Labs Plus
  • Treat Med Spa
  • Gameday Men's Health
  • DexaFit
  • pekoMD
  • Saltz Plastic Surgery
  • Pure Medical Spa
Y Combinator Summer 2015 Red Dot Award Winner 2025 Good Design Award Winner 2024

0.2 vs 4.4 points from DEXA.

ShapeScale averaged 0.2 points from DEXA, versus 4.4 points for Evolt 360.

In a same-day, back-to-back comparison against DEXA, ShapeScale was the only device to land close to the reference body fat % for both participants, making it the most accurate against the gold standard.

  • ShapeScale 0.2 pt avg. deviation
  • Evolt 360 4.4 pt avg. deviation
DEXA-referenced body fat % by participant, same day, back to back
Participant GE Lunar iDXA (reference) ShapeScaleEvolt 360
Alex
ShapeScale co-founder
10.1% 10.3% Closest to DEXA for Alex
+0.2 pt
5.7%
-4.4 pt
Martin
ShapeScale co-founder
16.7% 16.9% Closest to DEXA for Martin
+0.2 pt
No reading taken

Evolt 360's average uses one participant; no reading was taken for Martin.

Alex and Martin, the two participants in this test, are ShapeScale's co-founders.

A note on scope: this comparison covers two people, which is not a statistically significant sample, and we don't present it as a clinical validation. We ran it to compare every scanner directly: same people, back to back, same day, same body conditions.

Eight ways the devices differ

ShapeScale compared with Evolt 360 across eight criteria
Criterion Recommended ShapeScale Evolt 360
01. Client experience of the scan Fast BIA read; reliability affected by food, hydration, and exercise.
02. Visual output None; numeric dashboard with gamified badges.
03. What the device measures
Evolt 360 · 14 metrics
  • BMI
  • BMR
  • TEE (energy expenditure)
  • Body fat % & mass
  • Visceral fat (lbs & in²)
  • Subcutaneous fat
  • Skeletal muscle mass
  • Segmental lean/fat
  • Protein & mineral mass
  • Total body water
  • Abdominal circumference
  • Waist-to-hip ratio
  • Bio Age
  • BWI® Score (out of 10)
04. Data presentation Numeric dashboard plus badges; staff interpretation needed. Has an app, but it isn't user-friendly. Printouts need their proprietary paper.
05. Retention power High Gamification helps; a leaderboard alone doesn't excite enough. Moderate
06. Shareability / marketing power High Badges shared in-app, rarely outside it. Moderate
07. Trust & perceived authority Reads more like a wellness app than clinical; low accuracy.
08. Pricing $8,000 plus $200/mo software and result-sheet paper ($116 per 500 sheets)

What clients and staff actually see

Evolt 360 (print first)

Printed Evolt 360 Body Scan result sheet with numeric data and a BWI score
Evolt 360's printed result sheet, with numeric data and a gamified BWI score.
Evolt 360 app summary list screen showing numeric metrics
Evolt 360's app summary list screen.

What's actually on the floor

Evolt 360 body composition analyzer: a black upright BIA scale with hand electrodes and a screen
Bioimpedance (BIA) Evolt 360 An upright bioimpedance (BIA) scale. The client holds hand electrodes while standing on foot electrodes; the device estimates composition from electrical resistance.

Up close: built to sit out front

Close-up of the ShapeScale telescoping arm
Close range, every angle The arm circles your client at a steady 50 to 60 cm, so the whole body is captured from the same close distance.
Close-up of the ShapeScale platform edge
A scale built into the platform Clients step on and stand still. Weight is recorded during the same scan, so there's no separate scale step.
Close-up of the back of the ShapeScale sensor head
One sensor head, two kinds of vision Infrared depth sensors map body shape while a 12MP color camera captures a photorealistic model. Light only, no radiation.
Close-up of where the ShapeScale arm meets the base
An arm that telescopes and folds It extends to each client's height, then folds down low when the scan is done. It needs about 5 ft of clear floor.

Switch path

Don't switch. Audition it.

Run it next to your current device during the 45-day return period. Keep whichever earns the room.

The audition terms

30-minute demo

on your kind of cases.

Install in under an hour

one outlet.

Front desk runs it

from day one.

Common questions

How accurate is ShapeScale compared to DEXA versus Evolt 360?

In a same-day test against the GE Lunar iDXA, ShapeScale averaged 0.2 points from the reference body fat %, versus 4.4 points for Evolt 360.

Who ran the DEXA accuracy test, and how?

Alex and Martin, the two participants in this test, are ShapeScale's co-founders. The test ran same day, back to back against a GE Lunar iDXA reference scan. A note on scope: this comparison covers two people, which is not a statistically significant sample, and we don't present it as a clinical validation. We ran it to compare every scanner directly: same people, back to back, same day, same body conditions.

How does ShapeScale's price compare to Evolt 360?

ShapeScale is $9,990 one-time, or $299/mo on the 12-Month Plan, or $199/mo billed annually; software included (ShapeScale live pricing page, checked 2026-11-12). Evolt 360 is $8,000 plus $200/mo software and result-sheet paper ($116 per 500 sheets) (ShapeScale sales comparison research, checked 2026-10-15).

What's the client experience and data like on Evolt 360 versus ShapeScale?

ShapeScale: Under a minute. The sensors rotate while the client stands still: no balance risk or dizziness. Facial recognition auto check-in. It measures Body weight, BMI, BMR, Body fat % & mass, Visceral fat (lbs), Lean mass, Lean Mass Index, Appendicular Lean Mass (arms & legs), Circumferences, Regional volumes, including separate upper-arm and forearm volumes, Shape Score, Health Score. Evolt 360: Fast BIA read; reliability affected by food, hydration, and exercise. It measures BMI, BMR, TEE (energy expenditure), Body fat % & mass, Visceral fat (lbs & in²), Subcutaneous fat, Skeletal muscle mass, Segmental lean/fat, Protein & mineral mass, Total body water, Abdominal circumference, Waist-to-hip ratio, Bio Age, BWI® Score (out of 10).

Is this comparison a clinical validation?

A note on scope: this comparison covers two people, which is not a statistically significant sample, and we don't present it as a clinical validation. We ran it to compare every scanner directly: same people, back to back, same day, same body conditions.

See it on your own data.

Book a 30-minute demo to see how ShapeScale fits your business, clients, and workflow.